Wednesday, December 7, 2022
HomeTechnologyWhy Automating The whole lot May Not Be Your Greatest Answer

Why Automating The whole lot May Not Be Your Greatest Answer

Low-code/no-code growth gives a tantalizing future the place nearly anyone can create workflow automation to streamline operations for a extra environment friendly, productive office. In keeping with TechRepublic, 47% of organizations already use low-code/no-code platforms, with workflow automation being the main motive. The enterprise world is definitely able to embrace low-code/no-code growth in its on a regular basis operations.

Nonetheless, as thrilling as the probabilities is perhaps, low-code/no-code growth may also be overused or poorly carried out; this creates issues in the long run merely for the sake of constructing issues simpler within the quick time period.

Ten years from now, organizations that aren’t cautious will seemingly discover themselves with dozens of pointless automated processes that run on numerous unstable platforms and that had been constructed by individuals who not work on the firm.

The Drawback With Automating First and Asking Questions Later

Within the e-book “Implementing Lean Software program Growth: From Idea to Money,” authors Mary Poppendieck and Tom Poppendieck stated: “We aren’t serving to our prospects if we merely automate a posh or messy course of.”

It’s necessary to do not forget that even when there’s little coding concerned in low-code/no-code workflow automation, the design and administration issues will nonetheless be much like full-on software program growth.

You may’t get away from the truth that advanced work processes are advanced, and the automation of these processes will mirror that.

Messy Processes Beget Inefficient Automation

The authors went on to say: “Any course of that could be a candidate for automation ought to first be clarified and simplified, probably even eradicating current automation. Solely then can the method be clearly understood and the leverage factors for efficient automation recognized.”

Take into account, for instance, that you’ve a requisition system that requires 5 completely different approvals to maneuver ahead. So that you automate the approval course of. You may save workers a couple of minutes sending emails and filling in spreadsheets, however what if the basic inefficiency lies within the approvals themselves? What in case you don’t want that many approvals to start with? Automating unoptimized processes solely hardwires inefficiency into the system and makes it tougher to alter later.

Assessing Whether or not You Ought to Automate With a Low-Code/No-Code Platform

To take advantage of out of those platforms, it’s essential to ask the appropriate questions earlier than leaping straight to automation. It’s the one manner to make certain you’re making a course of that can assist your corporation keep effectivity for years to come back. Listed here are 4 questions it is best to ask to determine whether or not a low-code/no-code automation resolution is true for the job:

1. Do I do know sufficient about workflow and course of evaluation to be assured in my selections?

Used successfully, automation can streamline current processes and unlock workers’ time to work on extra necessary issues.

Used ineffectively, nevertheless, automation might cement wasteful processes into your operations and make them tougher to get rid of sooner or later.

When Toyota developed the lean manufacturing method, it didn’t instantly begin automating every thing. As an alternative, the corporate invested closely in steady course of enchancment and hyper-optimizing its workflows. Be sure to have the experience essential to know whether or not a course of really must exist and is well-optimized earlier than you start to automate.

2. How crucial is a course of to our group?

Software program growth has an extended historical past of high quality evaluation and high quality assurance processes which might be usually lacking in low-code/no-code growth. It’s necessary to needless to say a scarcity of coding doesn’t imply there might be a scarcity of errors — the system will solely ever do what you inform it to do.

Though the chance is mostly a lot decrease on these platforms than for builders, in case you’re attempting to construct one thing for a business-critical course of, it pays to take additional care and time to be sure to can get it proper. In these circumstances, it’s usually greatest to construct a number of small automation methods as a substitute of 1 huge one. That manner, you’ll be a lot much less prone to neglect about how items work as you’re piping information from one half to a different.

3. Do I perceive the necessity for longevity?

Typical software program growth tends to occur with a five- to 10-year outlook in thoughts, however this lengthy view is usually lacking from low-code/no-code software program. Workers fail to judge dangers which may flip up within the subsequent yr or extra and as a substitute focus solely on the present job at hand.

However what occurs whenever you assume out to 6 or 12 months sooner or later? Will you continue to be in the identical place then? If not, how will you hand the mission off to another person? Past that, how will issues look in 5 years? Is it seemingly that the platform you’re utilizing will nonetheless be round? Brief-term positive aspects are likely to overshadow these necessary long-term issues in low-code/no-code growth.

4. Am I okay with throwing experiments away on the journey to a workable mission?

You don’t need to spend a ton of time placing collectively an enormous plan for an automation mission after which constructing it multi functional go. As an alternative, it’s smarter to start out sooner after which work in smaller batches. These batches can give you a strong studying suggestions loop that can show you how to keep away from losing time creating options nobody will use. By engaged on and delivering smaller segments, you may experiment and iterate to construct helpful and environment friendly processes as a substitute of ones that don’t accomplish your objectives.

Instruments that allow folks to automate and not using a deep understanding of software program engineering and design ideas are on the rise — which implies so is the chance of baking inefficiencies and defective assumptions into workflows.

Earlier than creating one thing that can solely be a burden down the road, consider the larger image and decide in case your processes are prepared for automation.

Picture Credit score: Markus Spiske; Unsplash; Thanks!


Aaron Bruce

Developer at Synapse Studios

Aaron Bruce is a developer at Synapse Studios. He has over a decade of technical expertise spanning many industries, together with healthcare, monetary providers, tourism, hospitality, and extra.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments